International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods

An ISO Certified Peer-Reviewed Journal

ISSN: 2455-6211

Latest News

Visitor Counter
5014297961

Uniform Civil Code: Issues and Challenges- A ...

You Are Here :
> > > >
Uniform Civil Code: Issues and Challenges- A ...

Uniform Civil Code: Issues and Challenges- A Study

Author Name : Saurav Yadav

ABSTRACT The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has been a subject of intense debate and discussion in India, reflecting the country's diverse cultural, religious, and legal landscape. This abstract explores the concept of a UCC, its significance, challenges, and potential implications. A Uniform Civil Code aims to replace personal laws based on religion with a common set of laws governing matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption for all citizens, irrespective of their religious affiliations. Proponents argue that a UCC would promote gender equality, secularism, and national integration, while critics express concerns over the potential erosion of religious freedom and cultural autonomy. One of the primary arguments in favor of a UCC is the promotion of gender justice. Personal laws under various religions often contain discriminatory provisions against women, particularly in matters of divorce, inheritance, and maintenance. Implementing a uniform set of laws would ensure equal rights and opportunities for all citizens, regardless of their religious backgrounds. However, implementing a UCC is not without challenges. India's rich cultural and religious diversity complicates the task of drafting a code that respects the rights and beliefs of all communities. Opposition from religious and conservative groups, who view personal laws as integral to their identity and autonomy, further complicates the process. Furthermore, the UCC debate intersects with broader discussions around secularism and state neutrality. While proponents argue that a common civil code would strengthen the secular fabric of the nation by treating all citizens equally before the law, opponents fear it could lead to state interference in religious matters and undermine the principle of secularism.